This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Oct. 3, 2012

Defendants claims Internet pharmacy law murky when alleged crimes committed

Attorneys for three defendants in an online prescription drug case argued Monday that when their business was operating in 2006, the law covering such operations was still murky.


By Hadley Robinson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Attorneys for three defendants in an online prescription drug case argued Monday that when their business was operating in 2006, the law covering such operations was still murky.


All three men contend they thought their actions were legal and two even took the Drug Enforcement Administration to federal court over a difference of opinion on whether a face-to-face meeting with a patient was a requir...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up