Litigation
Feb. 1, 2006
Change in Unfair-Competition Law Begs 'Causation' Question
Focus Column - By Christopher J. Lovrien - The California Supreme Court has granted review in at least nine separate cases to determine whether changes made to California's unfair competition law and the false advertising law by Proposition 64 apply to cases pending at the time of passage. See Bivens v. Gallery Corp., 110 P.3d 1218 (2005). In all of these cases, the focus of the parties has been on the new injury-in-fact requirement.
By Christopher J. Lovrien
The California Supreme Court has granted review in at least nine separate cases to determine whether changes made to California's unfair competition law and the false advertising law by Proposition 64 apply to cases pending at the t...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In