This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Environmental

Jan. 27, 2006

Polluting the Point of the Clean Water Act

Forum Column - By Roderick E. Walston - The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided to review three environmental cases, the first such cases selected for review since Chief Justice John G. Roberts took the helm. All three cases raise issues of federalism in environmental law, and, more specifically, about the roles of the federal government and the states in regulating water. Rapanos v. United States , 04-1034; Carabell v. United States , 04-1384; S.D. Warren Co. v.

        
Forum Column

By Roderick E. Walston
        
        The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided to review three environmental cases, the first such cases selected for review since Chief Justice John G. Roberts took the helm. All three cases raise issues of federalism in environmental...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up