This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Administrative/Regulatory

Jan. 25, 2006

When Procedure Stands in the Way of Justice

Forum Column - By Radha A. Pathak - In Evans v. Chavis , 2006 U.S. LEXIS 757 (Jan. 10), the U.S. Supreme Court crafted a rule that is unfair to California prisoners, burdensome for federal courts and violative of principles of federalism. It is easy to overlook the Chavis case, which appears to involve only a minor aspect of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, the statute that governs the filing of writs of habeas corpus in the federal courts.

        
Forum Column

By Radha A. Pathak
        
        In Evans v. Chavis, 2006 U.S. LEXIS 757 (Jan. 10), the U.S. Supreme Court crafted a rule that is unfair to California prisoners, burdensome for federal courts and violative of principles of federalism. It is easy to overlook the ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up