This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Nov. 18, 2010

An Unfair Balance

A trial attorney's observations regarding the Judicial Council's proposals governing televisions in the courtroom. By James R. Robie of Robie & Matthai.


By James R. Robie


In August, the Bench-Bar-Media Committee of the Judicial Council issued a draft report entitled "A Balancing Act" which, if adopted, would dramatically increase the use of television cameras in state court proceedings.


I was flooded with memories of televised trials of O.J. Simpson, Lyle and Eric Menendez, and the community's adverse perception of the legal system, attorneys and our courts as I read this proposal...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up