This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Oct. 10, 2015

Is a text a 'writing' under the statute of frauds?

A law which recently took effect in California expressly excludes text messages from the definition of 'writing' when it comes to satisfying the statute of fraud in real estate contracts. By Robert C. Barnes

Robert C. Barnes

Senior Counsel
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP

Robert is a real estate transactional attorney and senior counsel in the firm's Los Angeles office.

See more...


By Robert C. Barnes


The statute of frauds is a venerable doctrine in real estate law, requiring most real
estate contracts to be in writing. But in an age of tweets, texts and instant messages,
do such informal communications qualify as "writings"?


The California Legislature attempted to answer that question with Assembly Bill 2136,
which took effect Jan. 1 this year. It provid...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up