Civil Litigation,
Letters,
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Sep. 29, 2015
Limiting confidentiality in mediation is a slippery slope
A Sept. 24 a piece impliedly refuted my arguments opposing the California Law Revision Commission's current study, K-402.
A. Marco Turk
Emeritus Professor
CSU Dominguez Hills
Email: amarcoturk.commentary@gmail.com
A. Marco Turk is a contributing writer, professor emeritus and former director of the Negotiation, Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding program at CSU Dominguez Hills, and currently adjunct professor of law, Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, Pepperdine University Caruso School of Law.
A Sept. 23 piece by Elizabeth A. Moreno and Larry Doyle, "New CLRC rules unfairly criticized," impliedly refuted my arguments opposing the California Law Revision Commission's current study, K-402. This would remove mediation confidentiality protection where clients sue their lawyers for malpractice allegedly committed in connection with such mediations.
In responding to the Moreno and Doyle assertions that support K-402, it is interesting ...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In