This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Personal Injury & Torts

Aug. 15, 2012

Is the primary assumption of risk doctrine on its way out the door?

The Supreme Court's decision in Nawla may answer that question soon. By Donald R. Wild and James J. Patrick of Wild, Carey & Fife


By Donald R. Wild and James J. Patrick


The short answer: it's not going strong, but staying alive, although perhaps soon to be gone for amusement park rides.


At least for those of us who regularly defend automobile and motorcycle racing venues, ice skating rinks, skiing and snow boarding resorts, and amusement parks, this very important question will be answered shortly by the state Supreme Court in Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P. No. S195031.

...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up