Litigation
Aug. 3, 2012
Samsung's conduct spurs adverse jury instruction
An ineffective litigation hold resulted in a major setback for Samsung; learn the law behind the ruling. By Brittany W. Yang and Matthew A. Cebrian of Murphy Pearson Bradley & Feeney PC
With the landmark trial in Apple's $2.52 billion case against Samsung for allegedly infringing upon key patents related to its popular iPhone and iPad products now under way, the value of a recent court order carrying the potential to tilt the scales in favor of Apple will undoubtedly be tested.
In the week leading up to jury selection, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal ordered that the jury receive an advers...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In