Litigation
Jul. 31, 2012
Compelling arbitration: who knows the rules to apply?
Trial courts continue to receive very inconsistent direction regarding the proper interpretation and application of the Federal Arbitration Act. By William F. Highberger of the Los Angeles County Superior Court
Trial courts continue to receive very inconsistent direction from the U.S. Supreme Court, the California appellate courts and the National Labor Relations Board, regarding the proper interpretation and application of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. Section 1 et seq., to state trial court cases. Because the arbitration alternative has so much impact on case value and because it is also intimately tied up with whether a case can ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In