This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 26, 2012

The piggyback strike suit

How viable are federal securities fraud class actions predicated on government investigations and whistleblower lawsuits? By John E. Schreiber and Ian C. Eisner of Winston & Strawn


By John E. Schreiber and Ian C. Eisner


With increasing frequency, the plaintiffs' class action bar has sought to predicate federal securities fraud class actions on little or nothing more than the public disclosure of government investigations or qui tam (i.e., "whistleblower") lawsuits involving alleged corporate misconduct. With many, if not most, industries facing increasingly complex regulatory environments, this has become a significant ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up