This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Health Care & Hospital Law

Jul. 19, 2012

Federal, state courts split on mental health insurance rules

Federal and state courts are divided over whether employees with mental health coverage can demand insurers pay for a broad range of services.


By Paul Jones


Daily Journal Staff Writer


According to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, many employees with mental health problems can demand insurers pay for a broad range of services, including care at residential facilities.


But in a recent case involving private plans, a state court disagreed with that interpretation of the state's mental health parity law. As a result, Blue Shield, which is the defendant in both cases, has standa...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up