This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 18, 2012

'ESI' and 'data compilations': Why is Section 2031.280(e) still on the books?

The Electronic Discovery Act adopted federal cost shifting measures, but retained the state framework too. Why? By Mark Oneal Suttle of Parker, Milliken, Clark, O'Hara & Samuelian


By Mark Oneal Suttle


Have you ever run across a statutory framework that left you feeling that something just didn't fit together? That was my reaction when the 2009 Electronic Discovery Act "adapted" new CCP Sections 2031.060(e) and 2031.310(f) from the federal model to allocate discovery costs for "electronically stored information" that is "not reasonably accessible," but also retained California's old "cost shifting&...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up