This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Law Practice

Jul. 13, 2012

Suing for unpaid fees: the pitfalls, the pitfalls and the pitfalls

I have a very strong bias towards walking away because there are simply too many pitfalls. By Richard Hamar of Hamar & Hamar APC


By Richard Hamar


This is the final part of a two-part series discussing the pitfalls of suing clients for unpaid fees.


Pitfall Two: Cross-Complaints


In Texas Lawyer Reports, Jim Pennington states that more firms seem willing to assume the risk of drawing malpractice counterclaims in order to collect unpaid fees, especially at a time when firm revenues are down. "The most obvious explanation would be because of the economy, and they would ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up