This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Intellectual Property

Jul. 10, 2012

The (un)safe harbor of willful blindness

Courts sometimes cross-apply legal doctrines from other areas of jurisprudence; such is the case with willful blindness in copyright law. By Lorelei D. Ritchie of the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board


By Lorelei D. Ritchie


Courts will look a few places when determining a case. They look at precedent in the circuit. They look to sister circuits for persuasive analogy. And, when neither will quite suffice, they sometimes need to be innovative. Courts sometimes will, and necessarily must, cross-apply legal doctrines from other areas of jurisprudence when they find statutory and common-law guidance to be lacking. The doctrine of willful blindness has followed this...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up