This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

May 20, 2016

LSAT: essential predictor of law school success?

The University of Arizona shouldn't be punished for experimenting with an alternative to the Law School Admissions Test. By Thomas F. Guernsey

Thomas F. Guernsey

See more...

By Thomas F. Guernsey

Institutions of higher learning have been using graduate admissions tests to measure and predict the academic success of their applicants for a long time. This especially holds true for law schools that require their applicants to take the Law School Admissions Test.

The recent controversy over the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law admitting a small portion of applicants who took the Graduate Records...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up