This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

May 6, 2016

Gig economy may have to wait for answers

if the district court approves the settlement, the Uber litigation will no longer be the bellwether case for whether tech companies in the gig economy are properly classifying their workers. By Valerie Brender

Valerie J. Brender

Rukin, Hyland & Riggin LLP

100 Pine St
San Francisco , CA 94111

Phone: (415) 421-1800

Email: vbrender@rukinhyland.com

New York Univ SOL; New York NY

See more...

By Valerie Brender

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals announced last month that it would weigh in on the closely watched independent contractor misclassification class action against Uber Technologies in O'Conner v. Uber Technologies Inc., 13-CV3826 (N.D. Cal., filed Aug. 13, 2013). But Uber's announcement that it reached an up to $100 million settlement with plaintiffs in the California and Massachusetts lawsuits may mean that the 9th Circuit ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up