Labor/Employment
May 3, 2016
Supreme Court arbitration case could change dynamics of employment class claims
If the state Supreme Court sides with a former salesperson who accused a Manhattan Beach Toyota dealership of race discrimination, it would undo a reason many employers require workers to sign contracts that bring potential disputes before an arbitrator.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
If the state Supreme Court were to side with a former car salesperson who accused a Manhattan Beach Toyota dealership of race discrimination, it would undo a key reason many employers require workers to sign contracts that bring any potential dispute before an arbitrator.
On Tuesday the court will hear oral arguments in Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive Inc., S220812, a dispute about who determines...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In