Labor/Employment
Apr. 28, 2016
State judges should ignore Iskanian's take on federal law
Given National Labor Relations Board decisions following Iskanian, such tempered deference to the decision is not warranted. By Dennis Moss
Since the California Supreme Court decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles LLC, 59 Cal. 4th 348 (2014), many plaintiffs' wage and hour class action lawyers have refrained from pursuing class relief in cases where employers have imposed class action bars in the context of mandatory arbitration policies. Some have resorted to merely pursuing Private Attorneys General Act claims with the idea that defendants wil...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In