This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Mar. 14, 2001

Drunkeness No Defense to Arson

SAN FRANCISCO - Drunkenness is not a defense to arson, the California Supreme Court ruled Monday. The justices held that arson is a general-intent crime, making voluntary intoxication inadmissible as evidence of the defendant's state of mind.

By Peter Blumberg
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - Drunkenness is not a defense to arson, the California Supreme Court ruled Monday.
        The justices held that arson is a general-intent crime, making voluntary intoxication inadmissible as evidence of the defendant's state of mind.
...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)