This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Sep. 8, 2011

California case law may help patients hoping to sue over generic drugs

Patients harmed by low-cost versions of brand-name drugs have little legal recourse after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states' failure-to-warn laws are preempted by federal regulations for generics - unless they sue in California.


By Mandy Jackson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Patients harmed by low-cost versions of brand-name medications have little legal recourse after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states' failure-to-warn laws are preempted by federal regulations for generic drugs - unless they sue in California.


Although the high court's June 23 ruling in Pliva Inc. et. al. v. Mensing barred failure-to-warn claims against generic drugmakers, plaintif...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up