This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 26, 2011

Using confidential advisory opinions in difficult mediations

Confidential advisory opinions can bridge or narrow the evaluation gap, clearing the path to settlement. By Richard C. Neal and Barbara Reeves Neal of JAMS


By Richard C. Neal and Barbara Reeves Neal


A dramatic difference between the parties' case-strength evaluations is the biggest obstacle to mediated settlement in business cases. This is especially true where the dollars at stake are large and each party demands that the other write a large check. A non-binding, confidential advisory opinion can bridge or narrow the evaluation gap, clearing the path to settlement. The following describes the process and reason...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up