LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
The article, "An indemnity clause by any other name," by Dan Jacobson published August 3 was interesting and thoughtful, but wrong in one particular. Contrary to Jacobson's assertion, indemnification agreements are not generally covered by the statute of frauds and therefore need not be in writing. They are capable of being performed within one year, and are original obligations - not a promise to answer for the debt, de...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In