This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Aug. 21, 2003

Speaking Out

Writing the latest chapter in the struggle to resolve the tension between the statutory right of publicity and the constitutional right of free speech, the state Supreme Court has limited the circumstances under which its own 2-year-old "transformative" doctrine can be used to force creators of expressive works to face a jury trial in publicity-rights cases. Winter v. DC Comics , 30 Cal. 4th 881 (2003).

Douglas E. Mirell

Partner, Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP

Email: dmirell@greenbergglusker.com

Doug's practice focuses on privacy, defamation, publicity rights, copyright, trademark and First Amendment litigation.

Joseph I. Geisman

Email: josephgeisman@gmail.com

        
        Writing the latest chapter in the struggle to resolve the tension between the statutory right of publicity and the constitutional right of free speech, the state Supreme Court has limited the circumstances under which its own 2-year-old "transformative" doctrine can be used to force creators of expressive works to face a jury trial in publicity-right...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)