This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Tax

May 14, 2014

Why is divorce so expensive? Because of the IRS

A recent decision of the U.S. Tax Court highlights the need to carefully consider marital settlement agreements. By Mitchell A. Jacobs and Brett A. Berman


By Mitchell A. Jacobs and Brett A. Berman


The U.S. Tax Court recently issued a summary opinion in the case of Roscoe Jerome McNealy and Leanna Yvonne McNealy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, granting the commissioner's motion for summary judgment and denying the petitioners' alimony deduction claimed on their 2009 federal income tax return.


On April 6, 2009, Roscoe McNealy and Leanna McNealy entered into a marital settlement agreement...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up