Daily Journal Staff Writer
Finally, clarity after years of waiting. At least, that's what employment attorneys thought when the state Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that employers are under no obligation to require their workers take legally mandated lunch and rest breaks. But just how much each side has won or lost in the much-watched case has been at issue ever since.
Plaintiffs' lawyers had pushed for strict requireme...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In