This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

May 2, 2014

Case could remove toxic tort claim hurdle

In popular conceptions of civil law, it's hard to find a more sympathetic case than a toxic tort suit, or a less popular rule than a statute of limitations. By Jesse Lueders


By Jesse Lueders


In popular conceptions of civil law, it's hard to find a more sympathetic case than a toxic tort suit, or a less popular rule than a statute of limitations. Toxic torts call to mind movies like "Erin Brockovich" and "A Civil Action," which pit sympathetic plaintiffs suffering cancer and other serious health problems against large corporate defendants who have negligently or willfully polluted the environment in the pursuit...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up