This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Apr. 29, 2014

Racial preference ban was destined to be upheld

Last week, the U.S. high court resoundingly rejected the plaintiffs' claim that a ban on racial preferences violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. By Joshua Thompson


By Joshua Thompson


Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, 2014 DJDAR 4875 (April 22, 2014). And as I predicted ("Time to Embrace Race-Neutral Government," April 8), the court resoundingly rejected the plaintiffs' claim that a ban on racial preferences violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.


At issue was Article I, Section 26 of the Michigan Co...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up