This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 22, 2014

To sit, or not to sit? Questions remain

How the state high court answers questions about California's "suitable-seating" requirement may have class action consequences. By Karen Reinhold


By Karen Reinhold


It seems absurd that failure to provide a "suitable seat" to an employee if the nature of the employee's work permits sitting could form the basis for an expensive class action. Then again, it's also absurd that the failure to "provide" a 30-minute unpaid meal break has led to so many expensive class actions, yet it has. How the state Supreme Court answers questions recently posed by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appe...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up