This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Securities

Apr. 18, 2014

Flawed reasoning in ruling on broker-dealer arbitration

A new decision holds that if parties have not made a written agreement to arbitrate, a forum selection clause will operate as a "disclaimer" of an investor's right to form an arbitration agreement. By Matthew W. Woodruff


By Matthew W. Woodruff


The recent opinion of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Goldman Sachs & Co. v. City of Reno, 2014 DJDAR 4082 (March 31, 2014), is the latest installment in the ongoing effort of the federal judiciary to come to grips with the "request" part of FINRA Rule 12200. Under FINRA Rule 12200, a registered broker-dealer (and "member" of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) can be required to arbitrate a ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up