This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Appellate Practice

Jun. 13, 2006

Ruling Keeps Defendant's Home Inviolate

A groundbreaking 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that protects defendants awaiting trial from having their homes raided by police based on anonymous tips has drawn sharp objections and a plea for high-court review from seven conservative judges.

By Amelia Hansen
Daily Journal Staff Writer


      A groundbreaking 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that protects defendants awaiting trial from having their homes raided by police based on anonymous tips has drawn sharp objections and a plea for high-court review from seven conservative judges.
      Last fall, a 9th Circuit panel ruled 2-1 that the government violated t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up