Appellate Practice
Jun. 10, 2006
Courts Decide When 'Less' Is 'More'
Focus Column - By Denica E. Anderson and Catherine Valerio Barrad - The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has just denied en banc review of a case in which it held that when Congress said "less" it really meant "more." See Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1309, AFL-CIO v. Laidlaw Transit Services Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12521 (2006).
By Denica E. Anderson and Catherine Valerio Barrad
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has just denied en banc review of a case in which it held that when Congress said "less" it really meant "more." See Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1309, AFL-CIO v. Laidlaw Transit Services Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12521 (2006). The court was interpreting the provision of the ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In