This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Nov. 22, 2016

Hearsay, the experts say!

This past summer the California Supreme Court took the opportunity "to revisit and revamp" the hearsay rules related to expert testimony. By John T. Brazier and Katherine Frank

John T. Brazier

See more...

By John T. Brazier and Katherine Frank

California courts have long tolerated hearsay testimony related by expert witnesses as to both "general background information" and "case-specific facts," including inadmissible hearsay not falling within a recognized exception.

This past summer the California Supreme Court, in People v. Sanchez, 63 Cal. 4th 665 (2016), took the opportunity "to revisit and revamp" the hearsay rules related to e...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up