Perspective
Nov. 17, 2016
Justice to test free exercise clause limits
How far can a state pursue a proactive antiestablishment policy before it runs afoul of the free exercise clause of the First Amendment? That is the question before the U.S. Supreme Court. By Gunnar Gundersen and William S. Russell
Gunnar B. Gundersen IV
Partner
Gundersen & Gundersen LLP
Appellate Law
5000 Birch St Ste 3000
Newport Beach , CA 92660-2140
Phone: (949) 467-9299
Email: gunnar.gundersen@gundersen-law.com
Pepperdine Univ Law School
Gunnar's appellate practice includes the Supreme Court. In addition, he researches and lectures on religious freedom as an Affiliated Scholar of the James Wilson Institute on Natural Rights and the America Founding in Washington, D.C. For more information please go to www.gundersen-law.com
How far can a state pursue a proactive antiestablishment policy before it runs afoul of the free exercise clause of the First Amendment? That is the question before the U.S. Supreme Court in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Pauley.
Trinity applied for state funds from Missouri to use recycled-tire rubber to improve safety at its preschool's playground. Over 40 schools applied ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In