This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Nov. 3, 2016

Employers not required to list accrued vacation time

The California Court of Appeal recently confirm that itemized wage statements need not include accrued vacation pay. By Robert Fried and Amber S. Healy

Robert Fried

See more...

By Robert Fried and Amber S. Healy

On Oct. 20, in Soto v. Motel 6 Operating L.P., the California Court of Appeal held that employers are not required to list the value of accrued vacation time on wage statements provided to employees.

Plaintiff Lidia Soto alleged that Motel 6, her former employer, violated California's itemized wage statement statute, Labor Code Section 226, by failing to include the monetary value of accrued va...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up