This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Judges and Judiciary

Jul. 25, 2000

Once Is Enough

In a ruling that legal observers predict will have wide-reaching effects on the common practice of special appearances, the 4th District Court of Appeal has ruled that the Ontario law firm Covington & Crowe can be held liable in a malpractice suit even though the firm's attorney only represented the client in the underlying action on one occasion.

By Daniel Evans
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        In a ruling that legal observers predict will have wide-reaching effects on the common practice of special appearances, the 4th District Court of Appeal has ruled that the Ontario law firm Covington & Crowe can be held liable in a malpractice suit even though the firm's attorn...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up