This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jul. 22, 2000

Reverse Incrimination

When litigators propound interrogatories and requests for admission and make objections at depositions, they do so believing these tactics will benefit the case - no attorney would knowingly do something more useful to an opponent than to a client. Unfortunately, more often than not interrogatories, requests for admission and deposition objections benefit the opposition more than the client.

By Ken Klein
        When litigators propound interrogatories and requests for admission and make objections at depositions, they do so believing these tactics will benefit the case - no attorney would knowingly do something more useful to an opponent than to a client. Unfortunately, more often than not interrogatories, requests for admission and deposition objections benefit the opp...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up