This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 25, 2011

The good faith exception to the exclusionary rule: a shift in focus

What was an essential ingredient of the Fourth Amendment is now a 'bitter pill' to swallow. By Brian M. Hoffstadt of the Los Angeles County Superior Court


The Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule is anything but an absolute command. As a doctrine of judicial creation rather than constitutional imperative, this rule of evidence suppression has, for various policy reasons, been found not to apply at all in many criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings (such as grand jury proceedings, sentencing and probation revocation hearings, and immigration hearings). Not until 1984, however, did the U.S. Supreme Court first hold that t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up