This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 18, 2011

Release of one is release of all — but not for much longer

Inconsistent law as to proportional liability for joint tortfeasors may soon be resolved. By Karen Woodward and Hall Marston of Sedgwick LLP


By Karen Woodward and Hall Marston


There has long been an inconsistency in California law relating to discharge of the proportional share of liability for joint tortfeasors. Originally, California was an "all or nothing" tort liability state. Thus, if a plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, his or her claim was barred in its entirety. Similarly, among two joint tortfeasors, the one less culpable (as determined by an arcane set of obscure...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up