This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Courts of Appeal

Oct. 14, 2011

Panel skeptical of firm's bid to collect attorney fees from former clerk

A state appellate court seemed sympathetic Wednesday to a lawyer who was hit with a $120,000 attorney fee bill after losing a wage-and-hour case against his former law firm.


By Laura Ernde


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SAN FRANCISCO - A state appellate court seemed sympathetic Wednesday to a lawyer hit with a $120,000 attorney fee bill after losing a wage-and-hour case against his former law firm.


Matthew Zelasko-Barrett sued Brayton Purcell LLP for unpaid overtime he put in while clerking at the firm before he passed the State Bar.


But in August, the 1st District Court of Appeal ruled in a case of first i...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up