California Neutrals
Oct. 29, 2015
Is arbitration right for consumers? Feds begin rule-making
By Marty Graham
Nine months after a report by the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found mandatory arbitration clauses keep consumers from seeking redress, the bureau has begun the rule-making process to refine and possibly limit how mandatory arbitration works.
While the final resolution is many meetings away, (the first step begins Oct. 7 with a field hearing in Denver) the most pressing question has become obvious: will the rule be revised to allow...
Nine months after a report by the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found mandatory arbitration clauses keep consumers from seeking redress, the bureau has begun the rule-making process to refine and possibly limit how mandatory arbitration works.
While the final resolution is many meetings away, (the first step begins Oct. 7 with a field hearing in Denver) the most pressing question has become obvious: will the rule be revised to allow...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In