This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jul. 4, 2003

Bifurcation of Punitives Is Not Necessarily Best for Defendant

Focus Column - Litigation - By John B. Quinn and William C. Price - On the morning of your final status conference, your client, the defendant, cannot lose one pretrial motion: bifurcating punitive damages from liability. True, your motion to exclude consequential damages may be iffy. And you may have only a 50-50 chance of winning your motion to disqualify the plaintiff's touchy-feely expert. But a California court must grant the motion to bifurcate. Civil Code Section 3295(d).

        Focus Column
        
        Litigation
        
      ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)