This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Sep. 15, 2012

When cognitive biases trump science

Sometimes police fall into a well-known cognitive bias: they discount evidence that does not support what they already believe, and instead go hunting for evidence bolstering their case. By David A. Harris


By David A. Harris


"Failed Evidence" explores the real reasons that police and prosecutors resist scientific change, and it lays out a concrete plan to bring law enforcement into the scientific present. The following excerpt comes from Chapter 2, "Science and Traditional Police Investigative Methods: A Lot We Thought We Knew Was Wrong."

Police Interrogation of Suspects: The practice and Science of Asking Questions

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up