This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Aug. 28, 2012

Peer review at a crossroads in California

Clinically and behaviorally challenged physicians are now empowered by the decision in Fahlen to launch harassing lawsuits against hospitals and peer reviewers. By Carlo Coppo of DiCaro, Coppo & Popcke


By Carlo Coppo


Clinically and behaviorally challenged physicians are now empowered by the decision in Fahlen v. Sutter Central Valley Hospital, 2012 DJDAR 11289 (Cal. App. 5th Dist. Aug. 14, 2012), to launch harassing lawsuits against hospitals and peer reviewers directly without exhausting administrative and judicial remedies, chilling, if not ending, the statutorily-mandated peer review systems designed by the Legislature. Victims of this trend will be p...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up