Letter to the Editor
Aug. 16, 2012
Reports of Continental’s impact are greatly exaggerated
While the court allowed "stacking" of policies absent an "anti stacking" provision, it noted an insurance company's right to limit liability by including such provisions in a policy. By Joshua N. Willis of MacGregor & Berthel
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
In a doom and gloom article interpreting last Thursday's state Supreme Court decision in State of California v Continental Insurance, 2012 DJDAR 11033 (Cal. Aug. 9, 2012), which permitted "stacking" of insurance policies in certain circumstances, the Daily Journal suggests a dramatic impact on the insurance industry, quoting one of the defense attorneys in the case that, "I think it will make [insurance companies] mor...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In