This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Commercial Law

May 18, 2011

Court Relaxes Attachment Law for Purposes of Arbitration

Ex parte grounds in state attachment law need not be strictly met when considering a right to attach order in arbitration. By Henry S. David of Snell & Wilmer


By Henry S. David


On March 22, the Court of Appeal issued a decision of great practical importance in light of the explosion of commercial matters that are arbitrated, not litigated in court. In California Retail Portfolio Fund GmbH v. Hopkins Real Estate Group, 193 Cal. App. 4th 849 (2d Dist. Mar. 22, 2011), the court ruled that the ex parte grounds in the state attachment law provide "guidance," but need not be strictly met, in determini...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up