This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Sep. 6, 2001

License to Grab

On April 18, 2001, three justices of the 5th District Court of Appeal, in the unpublished opinion Perry v. Pima-Gro Systems Inc ., FO33594 (5th Dist. decision April 18, 2001), decided that Gail Perry, who was sexually assaulted by her supervisor on several occasions over four days, was not subjected to a hostile work environment as a matter of law.

        By Steven R. Pingel
        
        On April 18, 2001, three justices of the 5th District Court of Appeal, in the unpublished opinion Perry v. Pima-Gro Systems Inc., FO33594 (5th Dist. decision April 18, 2001), decided that Gail Perry, who was sexually assaulted by her supervisor on several occasions over four days, was ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up