This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Personal Injury & Torts

Jan. 8, 2000

Assuming Risk

A series of cases has refined the doctrine of assumption of risk and re-defined how to bring motions for summary judgment.

By Michael A. Geibelson and Amanda N. Luftman
        In what has become an annual tradition since Knight v. Jewett, 3 Cal.4th 296 (1992), the Court of Appeal has reiterated the foundational principles of assumption of risk, this time in Record v. Reason, 73 Cal.App.4th 472 (1999). Along with Record came a series of cases that refined the doctrine of assumption of ri...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)