This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Jun. 1, 2016

Why did the jury rule for Google?

Larry Ellison's late decision to sue Google might have convinced jurors that Oracle merely wanted payday for Google's success with Android. By Pamela Samuelson

Pamela Samuelson

See more...

By Pamela Samuelson

Without interviewing the jurors individually, one cannot really know why they decided that Google's fair use defense should prevail in the $9 billion software copyright lawsuit that Oracle brought against the maker of the Android platform for Google's reuse of 37 components (known as packages) from the Java Application Program Interface (API).

What evidence might have made a difference to the jury? First, Larry Ellison, O...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up