This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor & Employment

Jul. 14, 2011

Pamela McKibbin Teren


If Teren had her way, her cases would all go before judges and juries, and not to arbitration.


"When you've got an arbitration, you cannot count on a big result," she said. "An arbitration agreement takes away the risk of very large verdicts for the company, and enhances your likelihood of outright victory somewhat. But arbitrators are more likely to split the baby than a jury or a judge would be. With judges and juries, you get a clean result....

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up